Hi Simon, Thanks for your quick reply.
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > it seems the feature announced in > <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index> (at > about > 2/3, search for ‘knee-to-beam’) has been implemented without providing > for this situation. So we should create a follow-up for > <http://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3831/>. I see, so that explains why all other tuplets behave normally: when I override them using \override TupletNumber.knee-to-beam = ##f all tuplets are moved upwards, so it seems the new algorithm isn't taking grace notes into consideration. I added this information mentioned here, as well as a link to this discussion, to the issue tracker, but my post is pending moderation. Cheers, Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Grace-note-kicks-tuplet-number-away-tp184567p184569.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
