On 7 Jan 2016 1:31 am, "Mark Stephen Mrotek" <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> wrote:
> > Chris: > > > What is the time signature? 6/8? > > Or is it 2/4 grouped as if in tuplets? > Mark Mark, Yes, it's 6/8. Although it changes to 4/4 for one movement - the one before this problem occurs (that may or may not be coincidental), and there's partial bars at the beginning and end of most of the movements Chris --- On 7 January 2016 at 09:05, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> writes: > > Are inlined images not OK here? ...or were you just being pedantic? > > ;-) > > They were inlined into the HTML part only rather than attached as a > separate MIME part with an inline disposition. > > As a result, a number of readers will not be able to see them (for > example, I had to switch my default viewing modes around after being > made aware by Thomas that there was supposed to be an included graphic) > and the list archives are not likely to offer them either since they > tend to trash the HTML parts. > > So your method of attachment is not likely to work well for a lot of > purposes (probably the only worse way would be to make it a background > image of the mail). I would strongly suggest that you try to figure out > one that would be more likely to work with the bulk of readers. OK, noted, thanks. I'm now rather accustomed to using webmail, and it's arguably a failing of the webmail client if it doesn't attach a drag-dropped file properly. Whilst I don't want to start a holy war on this point, I'd hazard a guess that the *bulk* of readers nowadays, by which I mean email clients designed for humans to read, are perfectly capable of reading HTML emails. The main exception I can see (and it's a good one) is a list archive. Would attachments be archived too? Inline replies vs top posting is the same argument IMO. Chris
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
