Hey all, one more beaming question (I deliberately keep these questions on -user as I think *user* input is important here):
When the user has requested manual beaming over rests at the end like c16 [ c c r ] (Hi Carl-Henrik ;-) ) what should the beam do at that moment? If you look at the first two sections/four systems of the attached score you can see that currently I let there be one beam by default and the full number of beams when strictBeatBeaming is on. LilyPond's behaviour so far has been to always print the second version. There are two things I would like to have here, but unfortunately I don't see how to implement either of them. In the default mode I would love to see stemlets over the rests. But that doesn't seem to work because as soon as there is a stem LilyPond automatically prints the corresponding beams. Currently I don't see a way to tell (from within the beaming pattern calculation) whether a stem belongs to a note or to a rest, all I know is if the stem is visible or not. The other thing I would like to see is that when the beamlets are printed (with strictBeatBeaming) they would be printed as beamlets (so the outermost stem goes to the end and secondary beamlets are shorter and thinner. But obviously LilyPond automatically prints them as beams that go right to the non-present stem. But my main question at this point is whether the behaviour with the one/multiple beams depending on strictBeatBeaming is appropriate. Urs PS Please ignore the lower sections. There are several issues with rests under beams that haven't been tackled yet.
rests-under-beams.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user