Am 20.01.2016 um 18:45 schrieb Kieren MacMillan: > Hi Urs, > >> shouldn't the subdivisions be rather considering the *written* durations? > > That should be the default, IMO. >
So PLEASE could a few people independently make some checks with 2.19.35 to see if subdivided beams under tuplets do what they should and what the docs say they do? Tests should include beams fully and partially under tuplets. And maybe some comparisons to 2.18.2 as well. I don't want to say more because I want unbiased opinions. Urs > Best, > Kieren. > ________________________________ > > Kieren MacMillan, composer > ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info > ‣ email: [email protected] > -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
