Graham Percival writes:
> Why do we need to have \lilypond{}, anyway? I mean, what's
> wrong with
> \begin{lilypond}
> \end{lilypond}
The initial idea (now broken in lilypond-book) was for \lilypond{}
to be a friendly way to get inline notes, without parskip and whatnot.
Typing \lilypond{bes''} is a bit friendlier than
\begin[fragment]{lilypond}
bes''
\end{lilypond}
esp. within a paragraph.
> It just seems to me that maintaining \lilypond{} is more trouble than
> it's worth.
I think it just broke because of the lilypond-book rewrite, and the
decision to require [fragment] explicitly.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
