Dear David, Thank you very much. Perfect. This is what I had hoped for.
I needed some time to find out how to insert "real" LilyPond accidentals instead of your "♯" but I think I can manage that now. (Just curious: What is ♯? Not the normal #.) Best regards, Robert Blackstone On 7 Feb 2016, at 11:39 , David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Robert Blackstone <blackstone.rob...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Dear All, >> >> Just as I was trying to formulate a request for some additional feature >> related to >> Super and Sub I saw Joram's mail, the first of this thread, with which I very >> much agree. >> >> So maybe I can use this thread to ask for the following: >> >> In comments accompanying some scores I feel a need for BC figures, as shown >> in these screenshot:. (typeset with ConTeXt, Im not sure this feature exists >> in >> LaTeX) >> >> * >> and >> * >> >> Would this be doable in LilyPond ? A sort of unattached Super-Sub couple (and >> triple) >> If not, could it somehow be added to its immense reservoir of features? > > #(define-markup-command (stack layout props args) (markup-list?) > (interpret-markup layout props > #{ \markup \tiny \raise #0.5 \general-align #Y #CENTER > \override #'(baseline-skip . 2) \right-column #args #})) > > \markup { Would be a \stack {6 5 3} on the > harmonized as \stack { 7 ♯3 } → \stack { 7 5 }, } > > >> (Preferably with LilyPonds own accidentals and perhaps the BC-font.) > > Well, what you put in there is up to you. > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user