>> I don’t think that not having a proper >> scope for each book/bookpart is a problem. > > I think it is. > >> So I’d vote for this change. > > I vote against it. It does not make sense that when I write
I would also say, without its own scope there is little gain and it will just lead to more confusion. You would need the LilyPond parser in your head to understand what will really happen. At least the 'simplified parser' in my head would expect a scope inside the braces :) Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
