Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2016-04-19 8:48 GMT+02:00 <msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca>:
>> On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Noeck wrote:
>>> think that is what confuses most people here. The error was non-fatal
>>> but still after everything is done, an additional fatal error is raised
>>> to draw attention to previous non-fatal errors.
>>
>> Those are fatal errors. They kill the program. They're just not
>> instantly fatal.
>
>
>
> My thesis was that even a non_fatal_error will be turned into a fatal
> for alerting purpose finally.
> See:
> \version "1.2.3"
> { c''1 }
>
> According to the lexer it's a "non_fatal_error" (and correctly
> reported in the log), but turned into a fatal later.
>
> If I'm wrong here I'd love to be corrected.
I don't think that it's the non_fatal_error per se that is turned into a
fatal error, but rather syntax errors specifically (at least the lexer
has a flag for keeping track of syntax errors). At least that's what I
seem to remember.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
