On Apr 20, 2016, at 12:41 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]> writes:
> 
>> Hi Dan,
>> 
>> \version "2.19.39"
>> 
>> \score {
>>  \new Staff \relative c' {
>>  \key ees \major
>>  \time 2/4 \clef treble
>>  <c ees>4 <ces ees ges~>
>>  <bes des \tweak Accidental.stencil ##f ges>4 <ges' ces~> 
>>  <fes \tweak Accidental.stencil ##f ces'>4 <aeses~ ces>
>>  <\tweak Accidental.stencil ##f aeses des>4 <des, ges~>
>>  <ees ges>4 a~
>>  <b, \tweak Accidental.stencil ##f a'>2
>>   }
>> }
> 
> \tweak Accidental.stencil ##f
> 
>    may be written a bit more high-level as
> 
> \single \omit Accidental
> 
>> It does look like a bug, though.
> 
> Yes, but I think we have an issue number for it already.  It's an effect
> of ties-over-linebreaks (and their effect on accidentals) being known at
> a point of time where the spacing is already rather fixed.
> 
> Another effect of the accidental being removed rather late in the game
> is that _if_ there is a line break (and the accidental is consequently
> left printed), another accidental _following_ right behind is left in
> place when it should be elided.  Better than removing it when it would
> be necessary, but still a nuisance.
> 
> -- 
> David Kastrup

I really appreciate these helpful and elegant solutions. Thank you both very 
much!

—
Dan


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to