2016-04-24 13:46 GMT+02:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > [...] Many python > syntax can be compatible with both Python2 and Python3 without much effort. > There are in practice only a few things that are a bit harder. For example > strings/unicode/binary datatypes. If it's only a limited amount of old code > that requires some effort to make it compatible with both Py2 and Py3 than > that might be worth considering. Writing new code using a common subset > isn't that difficult. That's where the six library can help.
Indeed, Frescobaldi 2 (just to mention the one I know best) has been supporting both Python 2 and 3 for some months (Frescobaldi 3 however will require Python 3). Best wishes. Davide _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
