Am 16.05.2016 um 01:23 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
2) The tremolo lines are too thick (they should be thinner than beams, but
in LilyPond they are the same thickness).
IMO your variant isn’t much better: The tremolo beams look *very* slim
now. Two ideas:
1. Does Gould say something about *how much* thinner they should be?
2. Shouldn’t the space between the beams be reduced at the same or at
least similar amount?
4) For notes on a staff line, the tremolo line closest to the heads
centered on a staff space. This is allowed in Gould, but not recommended.
The recommendation is that single tremolo strokes should center on a staff
line. The closest stroke and the single stroke are in the same position
in LilyPond, so I think it is best to move them to a staff line.
This thread from August 2015 might be related:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-08/msg00175.html
I posted a bug and an imperfect workaround there. I also reported the
bug here:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2015-07/msg00067.html
But I don’t think it’s been added to the tracker yet (IMO it’s different
from issue 3143, explanation see this thread).
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
