On 18.06.2016 17:27, David Nalesnik wrote:
(I would propose that bound-padding be redefined as a pair in the code base. Broken-bound-padding, too. The latter is not replaced with a broken-bound-padding-pair in this code experiment, but that should be easily done.)
Well, it should be pretty easy to use number-or-pair?, shouldn’t it? That way you can use both as a matter of convenience.
Best, Simon _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
