On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Simon Albrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 25.06.2016 20:22, David Nalesnik wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 1:19 PM, David Nalesnik
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 11:50 AM, matpen3@gmail <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Stephen,
>>>>
>>>> I’m using now
>>>>
>>>> \once \override TupletBracket.rotation = #'(0.1 -120 0.1)
>>
>> But it is strange that the TupletNumber doesn't follow along in this case
>> too...
>
>
> Well, it’s quite obvious that the current implementation of rotating objects
> is quite unsatisfactory. After all, the rotation isn’t even taken into
> account for spacing. (We have a ticket for that, IIRC.)

Yes, https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/2325/

David

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to