Am 29.06.2016 um 17:54 schrieb David Kastrup: >> That's not what Johan is talking about. What he refers to is that the >> > C #include syntax *looks* completely different from regular C/C++ >> > code, so nobody will mistake it for a regular function call or >> > whatever. >> > >> > But \include *looks* like it's working the same as \shape. > Where do you want to go from there?
Well, that's where I started this thread from. Being used to the syntax for the include command I assumed that \include is a function taking a string? argument and asked how to get there without literally entering that string. Which is exactly due to the fact that \include looks the same as \shape. Urs PS: By now I know why it doesn't work and have found a working solution (just to avoid triggering further rounds of discussion) -- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
