On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n192396...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am 8. Juli 2016 16:51:14 MESZ, schrieb Andrew Bernard <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=192396&i=0>>:
>
> >Consider this example:
> >
> >\version "2.19.44"
> >
> >{
> > \phrasingSlurDashed
> > c''4^\( c'' c''\)^\( c'' c''\)
> >}
> >
> >How would one get the second phrasing slur to be solid, not dashed? I
> >cannot simply place \phrasingSlurSolid between the end of the first
> >slur
> >and and start of the second.
>
> Why not?
> Can't you put the command before the first on *stops*?
>
Beat me to it. Like this:
{
\phrasingSlurDashed
c''4^\( c'' \phrasingSlurSolid c''\)^\( c'' c''\)
}
Not like this, because it has already begun (being attached to the previous
note, but this applies it to the next one where there is no PhrasingSlur):
{
\phrasingSlurDashed
c''4^\( c'' c''\) \phrasingSlurSolid ^\( c'' c''\)
}
Best,
Abraham
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Consecutive-slurs-with-differing-dash-patterns-tp192393p192399.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com._______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
