Hi Simon,
Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > On 09.07.2016 17:14, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: >> Andrew Bernard wrote >>> What nonsense Gould writes here. I perceive duration in notation on any >>> angle. The book is not always right in its justifications. >> I think what Gould means is that duration is notated in the x-axis of a >> staff, and so keeping beams close to the axis alignment is helpful. Maybe >> her logic here is flawed, but then again most modern editions tend to >> avoid >> large slopes for beams nowadays. > > It’s amazing how this makes an argument for kneed beams, so shunned by > most modern typesetters! I don't think I understand why this makes an argument for kneed beams, can't one can have the same slope for both a kneed beam and a non-kneed beam? Cheers! Gilberto -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/tuplet-bracket-slope-tp192294p192500.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
