Am 11. Juli 2016 19:39:14 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan <[email protected]>: >Hi Simon, > >> Currently, it’s beamed by half-measure, which I think impairs >legibility, so I introduced a patch changing this to beaming by quarter >note value (issue 4919). An earlier request for opinions didn’t harvest >any responses – would anyone like to chime in? :-) > >1. I prefer the beams in quarters; or, at the very least, the 16th >broken/subdivided by quarters.
+1 > >2. Does Urs’s recent work have any bearing on this? Apart from the fact that it hasn't progressed to a patch even? The autobeaming decisions are out of the scope of what I was working on (these decisions have already been made by then). But such a subdivision rule could be part of it, yes. BTW: I would like to change the default behaviour to have subdivisions turned on - an idea that Elaine Gould explicitly endorsed. Urs > >Cheers, >Kieren. >________________________________ > >Kieren MacMillan, composer >‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info >‣ email: [email protected] > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
