Hi Malte, Does the input have to match the output? Does it have to be ‘real’? I never thought of lilypond that way.
I have to do hundreds of these sorts of mods also. Can’t you just write a function and say something like: \tn 5 [And live with the ‘inelegance’?] Andrew On 25/07/2016, 8:00 PM, "Malte Meyn" <[email protected]> wrote: Am 25.07.2016 um 11:44 schrieb Andrew Bernard: > So they are tuplet 10/9. Can you not simply set the tuplet numbers accordingly? > > \once \override TupletNumber.text = "<your numbers here>" I could. But like my solutions with scaled durations, the input doesn’t really reflect the output. And when you have many of these tuplets, it’s much to type. So I wondered whether it would be possible/nice to have a more flexible \tuplet command. > What does Scriabin put for the tuplet number? He uses 5 (IMO the only correct solution, it’s definitely 5 quarters, not 10 eights). _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
