On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200
Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote:

> But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a 
> combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, 
> only one pad but with gap -> more typical).

Yes, simplicity is better. However, this looses the typical 'lotus'
appearance of a waterlily.

See e.g.
https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon

http://www.freepik.com/free-icon/lotus_864201.htm

http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-150336194/stock-vector-lotus-symbol.html

-- Johan

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to