Hi Urs,

> There's another improvement I'm right now experimenting with: Not having
> to type the second control point of the second spline but calculating
> that mirroring it from the third one of the first spline.

I <3 U.  =)

> After that I would like to suggest looking for a solution that will
> enable passing the control points as offsets against the default
> (non-compound) slur, like \shape does.

I <3 U mor.

Kieren.
________________________________

Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to