> There's another improvement I'm right now experimenting with: Not having
> to type the second control point of the second spline but calculating
> that mirroring it from the third one of the first spline.
I <3 U. =)
> After that I would like to suggest looking for a solution that will
> enable passing the control points as offsets against the default
> (non-compound) slur, like \shape does.
I <3 U mor.
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
lilypond-user mailing list