Hi Harm,
Thank you - I think I wrongly presumed the intention was to achieve a single hairpin in the score while retaining both hairpins in the separate parts for part production. To achieve this aim one might use tagging, I suppose, but is there another way in this situation of achieving a single hairpin whilst retaining individual hairpins in the parts? Otherwise, sorry for the noise. Alex > On Sep 27, 2016, at 10:14 PM, Thomas Morley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > 2016-09-27 22:56 GMT+02:00 Alex Voice <[email protected]>: >> >> >> Hi Harm, >> >> >> I'm not familiar with the partcombiner, though, below a very bad >> workaround, found deep, deep in the quick n' dirty junk room. >> >> >> \version "2.19.48" >> >> >> terminateHairpin = >> #(define-music-function (ctx-name mus)(string? ly:music?) >> #{ << $mus \context Voice = $ctx-name \grace s2\! >> #}) >> >> >> endI = \terminateHairpin "one" \etc >> endII = \terminateHairpin "two" \etc >> >> >> musicA = { >> g'1\> \endI R1\! >> } >> musicB = { >> b'1\> \endII R1\! >> } >> >> >> \new Staff \partcombineII \musicA \musicB >> >> >> >> >> >> I have tried your solution to Kieran’s recent problem with \partcombine, but >> didn’t manage to find the \partcombineII that you use - I hope it isn’t a >> stupid question, but where is this to found? >> >> >> Many thanks - as I’m sure I shall need it too sometime. >> >> >> Alex Voice >> > > > > > Aargh, a left-over-artifact. Use simple \partcombine > > > Sorry, > Harm >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
