OK. This was an idea that I had that I thought I'd share with you. My overall plan was that the website looks old and could use a redesign. I did it in WordPress because that is what I thought would be easiest for you, especially for things like the news and blog. Technically we could get a site that looks like this on almost any static site generator.
On Nov 29, 2016 5:48 AM, "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > > > Am 29.11.2016 um 11:25 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > What John did can be easily done with a static site generator, which > > would have many more chances to get accepted by LilyPond developers. > > One point that hasn't been raised in *this* thread is that using any CMS > on the donated web space we have is out of question. Anyone wanting to > have a WordPress site (or anything else) would have to find a hosting > solution for this - and would probably also be responsible for keeping > that safe and running. > > I personally would also be happy to have the website separate from the > docs, so it can be adapting to new ideas more easily. But I would much > more like to see it created by a static site generator, in a system > where the content can be managed as a Git repository. > > This doesn't say *anything* about the visual aspect of the current > proposal, though. > > Urs > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
