Dear John, tl;dr: I like it. Most of the following is said already.
welcome to this list and LilyPond! There are so many mails in this thread now. Therefore I try to keep it short. - This discussion comes up about once a year (-> archives) - I think I started one of those, so I am in favour of changes and your proposal. I see a need for a better look. - Thanks for your proposal and the work you already invested! It will help the discussion to be concrete and not just "in general". - With JS disabled, I can't see anything. I think there is no reason why the basic content shouldn't be visible without JS. I am with Teoh that JS can beautify things. - I like the look of your proposal! We can discuss details, I won't start listing them now. But I like it. - There is a huge process in place to get the documentation from text files. One proposal in earlier discussions was to separate the docs-part from the website (i.e. the front page etc.). - Please don't enforce the current technology for all future. There are valid reasons for the docs, - IMHO there should not be a divide between "wordpress" and "text- based/makefiles". The best of two worlds can be combined (html and css templates with a modern look and responsiveness and text based input). I am happy to see your (John's) opinion on that. My summary: Please, community, take this opportunity for a nice looking website for lilypond, decouple the docs technically, figure out the details and go for it. Cheers, Joram PS: This discussion is much better than any before... _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
