You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this: https://www.google.com/amp/www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/03/serif-vs-sans-the-final-battle/amp/?client=ms-android-google
On Nov 30, 2016 7:39 AM, "John Roper" <[email protected]> wrote: > In all sans-serif fonts that i's look like l's. Just writing this message, > my email client's font (Gmail) is the same way. > > On Nov 30, 2016 7:35 AM, "John Roper" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I can make the links in the footer brighter and I will look into other >> fonts to use. Arial is the default font for many websites and it is the >> fallback font for most web browsers. >> >> On Nov 30, 2016 7:30 AM, "Werner LEMBERG" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> One of the major things on the site that make it look antiquated >>> >>> is the LilyPond intro using the text that looks like it came from >>> >>> a server error message. >>> >> >>> >> LOL >>> > >>> > Concise, readable, informative: must be an error. >>> >>> Hehe. It's very annoying to me that so many sites use extremely thin, >>> gray non-serif fonts! Designers might me delighted, but such text is >>> *extremely* hard to read on an LCD if the viewing angle is not exactly >>> orthogonal to the LCD plane. >>> >>> Note that I don't insist on a serif script, but the selection of a >>> proper non-serif script is delicate. In particular, Arial is *very* >>> bad. We need one where `l' and `I' look distinct. >>> >>> John, here's another minor issue: The white commata between `Català', >>> `Česky', etc. look bad. I can imagine to replace them with middle >>> dots, without a final stop. And what about making those dark-gray >>> link entries also a bit brighter? >>> >>> >>> Werner >>> >>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
