Hi Alexander
IIUC (I didn't compile it in), your patch inhibits extenders on a single note, correct?
Yes.
Is that really what we want unconditionally,
Currently we get a short extender ... that is imho of no use and should be
killed.
or are there reasonable use cases where one might want to have an extender
printed after a single note?
No really ... but ... yes. In a situation like << { c1 } { a8 (g f g a2 ) } >>
it could be usefull.
Would need an override ...
Second: Did you test with broken extenders? Like
{ c1 d \break e f } \addlyrics { c de __ _ f }? Asking because there should be an extender for
"de" across the break despite the fact that both the d and e are "alone" on
that line. Such an extender may never be killed.
The 2nd part of the extender is killed by the "if (heads.size () < 2)". That could be changed to "if
(left_edge->internal_has_interface (ly_symbol2scm ("lyric-syllable-interface")) && heads.size () <
2)".
It's late now, good night.
Knut
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
