On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 2:38 PM, David Nalesnik <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Simon Albrecht <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> My ‘minimal’ example file is the attached one. Last time I tried to get >> to the source of the problem I found this tracker issue [1] and came to >> the conclusion that a fix would require integration of shapeII deep in >> the C++ LilyPond code to circumvent the really fundamental problems >> hinted there. >> Presumably the difference between your user experiences and mine has to >> do with the bug only (?) occuring with the (head x x) option. >> And certainly I agree that it would be marvelous to see the >> functionality in LilyPond proper, with this bug fixed. >> > > I would suggest removing the head functionality for the time being so > something can get into LilyPond proper without too much effort. >
Oh, that wasn't clear. Patch LilyPond with what of \shapeII works; keep the function as-is in openlilylib. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
