Absolutely agree :) Consider my last code a scheme exercise... On 28 January 2017 at 09:33, Helge Kruse <helge.kr...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am 26.01.2017 um 10:51 schrieb Gianmaria Lari: > > ... and this is one more way to do the change staff using a scheme > function > > that toggle between the two staff. > > > ... > > Not sure it can be more useful than the other ones. Also have no idea if > > this logic should be written differently. But it has been a nice scheme > > exercise :) > > I think it's better to use two switch the staves up and down. If you use > the same expression for both directions then you have to count the > instances to see where you are. This makes the Lilypond source less > readable. On the other side you would get a huge amount of warnings and > a scrambled output if you miss one of your \cs or misspelled it. > > Regards, > Helge > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
