I wrote the Blended system to fit all of the requirements for redesigning
the website (not documentation) for LilyPond. A nice side effect was that I
can use it for other things.

On Feb 4, 2017 5:59 PM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

> John Roper <johnroper...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:46 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> John Roper <johnroper...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>> >> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes:
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Separating website content from general documentation should
> >>> >>> > definitely be an option.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> What advantages do you expect from it?
> >>> >
> >>> > It is easier for users to write and it looks better.
> >>>
> >>> Who are "users"?  What are we wanting them to write?
> >>>
> >>> > Blended exports human-readable files.
> >>>
> >>> We already export human-readable files in a host of formats including
> >>> PDF, HTML, plain text.
> >>>
> >>> > Look at the website. http://jmroper.com/blended/
> >>>
> >>> My question probably was not clear enough.  What tangible benefits for
> >>> LilyPond's website and its ongoing maintenance do we expect to reap
> from
> >>> a move to Blended as its content management system?
> >
> > Design update.
>
> So this content management system prescribes a particular design, or
> makes implementing a particular design easier?
>
> > It looks better and attracts more users to the software.
>
> Last time I looked, users were not selecting their software by leafing
> through random web pages until they find a generally good-looking one
> and then being attracted to the software it advertises.
>
> At any rate, I wasn't really asking for advertising slogans here but
> rather concrete examples of stuff that would improve under such a
> change.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to