> > > So my question is: is there any good reason why Lilypond still does
> > > not allow multiple marks or tempo markings?
>
I can't answer that, but here's a way to get a rehearsal mark and a tempo
mark at the same point in time, using an empty chord:
\version "2.19.15"
{
R1
\mark
<>\tempo Allegro 4=120
R1
}
> > But I think if you want multiple marks the obvious solution is to
> > stack them in a column.
>
> That is an idea I hadn't thought of, and sounds like an excellent
> suggestion. But after experimenting with it, I have not managed to
> keep a fermata centred over the barline whilst having a longer text
> mark left-aligned on or near the barline. So far, then, I can't see a
> clear solution to what I wanted to do.
>
> David
>
Sounds like you want two marks next to each other, not in a column.
So, just have two marks in the same markup.
\version "2.19.15"
{
R1
\mark \markup { \fermata "Longer text mark" }
R1
}
To deal with alignment, you can use something like the following.
This isn't killer, since the amount of extra-offset to get the fermata
centered will depend on the size of your fermata; this is a manual
adjustment, not auto-centering.
\version "2.19.15"
{
R1
\override Score.RehearsalMark.self-alignment-X = #LEFT
\override Score.RehearsalMark #'extra-offset = #'( -1.5 . 0 )
\mark \markup { \fermata "Longer text mark" }
R1
}
HTH,
David Elaine Alt
415 . 341 .4954 "*Confusion is
highly underrated*"
[email protected]
self-immolation.info
skype: flaming_hakama
Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
