Noeck <[email protected]> writes:
> Dear Peter,
>
> Am 07.02.2017 um 14:04 schrieb Peter Toye:
>> I'd have expected a Dynamic staff to be a descendent of Staff. I was wrong!
>
> This is wrong in your case. But it is not completely out of scope. A
> TabStaff for instance is derived from a Staff:
>
> \new TabStaff {
> \override Staff.Clef.font-size = -5
> a b c d
> }
It isn't as much "derived from" as it is a redefined copy. But the act
of copying is a red herring here: it would make no difference if you
defined it in the same manner from scratch.
The important thing is that the definition of TabStaff contains a line
\alias "Staff"
and it is that line and nothing else which makes Staff-level overrides
register on a TabStaff.
The original code would have worked fine after
\layout {
\context {
\Dynamics
\alias "Staff"
}
}
as well, but I am skeptical that one would _want_ such an alias.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
