Hi David,
>>> \markup \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval
>>
>> I prefer
>> \markup \with-dimensions-from \null
>
> Different thing. \null corresponds to a point-stencil (single-point
> intervals), the first one corresponds to an empty-stencil (empty intervals).
Thanks for the clarification!
I have three questions on this topic:
1. Will ‘point-stencil’ still be unseen? Or does it literally output 1 point
[which could be seen at a high enough magnification]?
2. [Sometimes…? All the time…?] When I use
\mark \markup \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval [**]
the log gives
warning: RehearsalMark has empty extent and non-empty stencil
But output is as expected, and no other use of [**] seems to throw the same
error. Is there a better way to make my RehearsalMark markup not interact with
the spacing engine?
3. I’ve tried to simplify
\with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval
by making it a tweak like
nodim = -\tweak \with-dimensions #empty-interval #empty-interval \etc
But every combination of that which I’ve tried hasn’t worked. What is the
correct incantation, so that I can later say
c’-\nodim \markup “foo”
or
c’-\markup \nodim “foo"
?
Thanks,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
