Am 02.04.2017 um 22:48 schrieb David Kastrup:
Suppose someone™ made the effort
and folded Multi_measure_rest_engraver into Rest_engraver, why would
such an engraver be fundamentally able to take just one type of rest
and Do The Right Thing™, using ordinary rests or MMRs where
appropriate?
Because it wouldn't be the right thing to change one for the other.
Now that’s what I wanted to discuss – sorry for insisting. r and R are
/engraved/ differently, but – thinking outside the box – as far as I can
see, there is no semantic difference. Nor can I think of a usecase which
requires distinguishing them in a way that couldn’t just as well be done
automatically. I’m curious: does anybody have one?
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
