Thomas, Thank you for the alternatives. Since I have very limited knowledge as to how to customize (write Lilypond), I shall opt for 1) or 2). The result is more important than the method.
Mark -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Morley [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 12:34 PM To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <[email protected]> Cc: lilypond-user <[email protected]> Subject: Re: opus conflict 2017-04-30 21:04 GMT+02:00 Mark Stephen Mrotek <[email protected]>: > Thomas, > > Thank you for your detailed explanation. Your patient effort is appreciated. > As I understand now, some of the header fields are controlled by the \book > and some by the \score. > Your colored version is very illustrative, yet note that the "opus" is under > the first piece (subtitle) and not under the composer where I want it to be. This happens because the complete bookTitleMarkup is printed first by the scoreTitleMarkup (if print-all-headers = ##t). The remaining parts of the score-header are printed below (i.e. piece and opus). > That is where I have always seen it in my limited experience. > > Woodland Sketches > > E. MacDowell > > > Op. 51 > > To a Wild Rose > > Will o' the Wisp > > Is this possible with Lilypond? > > Mark > Sure. At least three possibilities (1) quick'n dirty arranger = "Op. 51" (2) quick'n dirty composer = \markup \right-column { "E. MacDowell" "Op. 51" } (3) go for custom book/scoreTitleMarkup I'd really recommend (3). You are not happy with the default, so why not change it? Timothy already posted a possibility. If you like it, ok. If you want some changes and feel not confident enough to implement them yourself, ask back. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
