Hi Robert,
You can use this definition:
ficta = { \once \override AccidentalSuggestion #'parenthesized = ##t \once \set
suggestAccidentals = ##t }
And use it this way just before the note with an ? : cis4 \ficta cis?
Have a nice day,
Rémy
> Message du 24/05/17 10:59
> De : "Robert Blackstone"
> A : [email protected]
> Copie à :
> Objet : Can an augmentation dot be parenthesized?
>
>Dear all,
I'm transcribing a few handwritten late 17th century fragments of music.
>
There are a few problematic spots. (Perhaps the composer or writer was in a
hurry, the whole thing is difficult to read anyway and it contains some symbols
I've never seen before. see screensho.t)
>
For two consecutive bars the time seems to have changed, from 6/2 to 5/2,
which, as far as I know, was never done in that period. There is, in fact no
time signature at all but 11 of the 13 bars in the fragment are clearly in 6/2
(or perhaps 3/1) and 2 bars contain notes and rests in both staves that add up
to 5/2
>
That leaves me with the choice: either to ignore it, or correct it. In the
latter case I would have to add an augmentation dot to a few notes and rests.
>
Can anybody tell what the standard procedure is in cases like this one:
- ignore, i.e. tweaking things so that it looks exactly like the manuscript , or
- correct it. In the latter case the corrections or corrected symbols must
probably be marked somehow. I can place (?) above the corrected note or rest,
which is not very specific.
>
I would tather like to parenthesize these added augmenation dots but I've not
found a way to do that.
>
Is it at all possible? And if yes, how?
>
Thanks in advance for any advice.
>
Best regards,
>
Robert Blackstone
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
