Kieren MacMillan wrote > That's very interesting! Right now I'm putting together a comparative > analysis of the different methods of coding shared/split staves; this is > not one I had previously seen or considered. As it relies on the > partcombiner — which is both feature-poor and limited to two voices — it > has some drawbacks; but there are also some benefits to the approach. > Thanks for sharing it!
I'd be fascinated to have an in depth conversation about shared staves in Lilypond. I've been giving a fair bit of thought to how I'd like it to work, at least based on my particular use case. Kieren MacMillan wrote > 2. Speaking from a depth of experience, I might recommend not worrying > about margin labels while composing… I find the mode-switching keeps me > from harnessing really good composition focus/flow. Agreed. It's not something I fix constantly, but it's annoying to worry about every time I want to print a fair copy of a draft, e.g. to submit to something. -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/parts-sharing-a-staff-tp203873p203876.html Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
