On 09/07/17 20:06, Flaming Hakama by Elaine wrote: > > > Le 9 juil. 2017 à 18:24, caag...@gmail.com > <mailto:caag...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > As you can see on the screenshot, both texts are misaligned. The > first one, a \tempo, is placed *under* the rehearsal mark instead of > next to it. > > > Another perspective is that the tempo is placed at the point of the > tempo change, rather than what you want, which is to place it at a point > in time after that change is supposed to have occurred. > > > How can I move the texts to be next to the rehearsal mark (without > manual adjustments)? > > > Well, you are asking for a manual change (due to a non-standard > placement of tempo), so please expect all solutions will necessarily be > manual. > > Since you want the tempo to appear over beat 2, you could try placing > the tempo there, rather than at the downbeat. > > Your desired solution is non-semantic, so it's coding will reflect that. > Maybe, but placing all related marks one after the other is just as semantically correct as placing them one on top of the other ... > > > Finally, these two statements are contradictory: > > A real engraver who wanted to stick to those conventions would > > presumably shift the note to the right > > > > wasted white space is high on my list of priorities > How come? Shifting the notes to the right wastes maybe one note-width of one stave. Stacking marks on top of each other wastes an entire line of text - bad enough in portrait music but appalling in landscape (where saving space tends to be extremely important - the music is only A5 to start with!)
Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
