On 9/12/17 10:50 AM, "David Kastrup" <[email protected]> wrote: >Menu Jacques <[email protected]> writes: > >> Pushing things further, I found that the removed third is not obvious >>in Cb5 below, >> but more seriously perhaps, that the removed C root leads to a G chord >>being >> displayed: >> >> * >> >> Don¹t know whether this is correct or not, though. > >LilyPond's current chord representation is not robust against complete >removal (as oppesed to inversion) of the root. > >So this is as expected right now. That does not mean it is musically >correct.
The code that Charles Winston created during GSoC this summer is robust against complete removal of the root. This should be up for code review shortly. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
