Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> writes:

>> The problem, from my point of view, is that lilypond syntax is
>> simple and makes sense to me. As soon as scheme gets involved, the
>> learning curve is like hitting a cliff.
>
> Are you aware of Urs's introduction to Scheme?
>
>   https://scheme-book.ursliska.de

It's worth pointing out that there is a world of difference between
cranking out simple wrappers (and it's become less wordy and thus less
arcane with 2.19.something) and cranking out the sort of off-the-cuff
programming David Nalesnik and Thomas Morley often demonstrate.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to