Dear Werner, sadly, you are right. I had a closer look at what I thought to be an ''es'' but is a ''dis'',
Nevertheless, in my idea it should be the user who would choose alternatives (historical (only sharps and b), my-way (flats, sharps and even double-falts and d-sharps), and alternative. I see python is used for jianpu, but I cant determine what it does (what it uses from lily for the output, and if it reads from a standard ly-file) Is it better I serch a scheme programmer or a python-man? Francois 2017-12-27 15:00 GMT-05:00, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]>: > >> About the flat in the new german TAB, > > AFAIK there doesn't exist a flat at all in the Neue Deutsche > Orgeltabulatur. > >> I would be pleased if you confirm me, or not: in Scheidemann's >> Judentanz, I read the (recurrent) es as it is and not as a s. > > I don't understand this sentence. Please rephrase and use quotes to > properly make a distinction between note names and normal text! > >> For, if this is how I read, the es could be the hook toward left >> (the is anyway toward right). > > Please provide a small image with marks that show what you mean. > Looking into the scan of the autograph, I only see alterations one > semitone up (i.e., a sharp). > > > Werner > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
