Hello Joram, Thanks for the clarification!
JM > Le 23 janv. 2018 à 21:42, Noeck <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Hi Jacques, > > in your 8 bars, you have only 4 different outcomes of your 8 different > inputs, combinations of (slashed/unslashed) and (slurred/unslurred). I > would just recommend to use the relevant command instead of adding extra > slurs to the input, i.e. to use your first line: > > 1. no slash, no slur: \grace > 2. slash and slur: \acciaccatura > 3. slash but no slur: \slashedGrace > 4. no slash but slur: \appoggiatura > > But that recommendation is just because it seems cleaner to me because > it does not duplicate things (slurs). > > At least the duplication does not seem to have side effects, there are > no double slurs or so. I looked at the source code and the slurred > variants have a 'SlurEvent ... START and ... STOP around them. So I > guess if you add a slur, it does not change anything as the slur is > alread "activated". But the developers might correct me. > > Cheers, > Joram > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
