On 28/01/18 20:09, David Kastrup wrote: > Wol's lists <[email protected]> writes: > >> I've just tried to do a cut-n-paste into a piece of music, from >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/bars >> >> At the very bottom you'll find >> >> \relative c' { >> c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.segno" } >> c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.coda" } >> c1 \mark \markup { \musicglyph "scripts.ufermata" } >> c1 >> } >> >> Okay, I was only copying the markup bit - I wanted it as markup in the >> middle of the bar - but I had to add a # as follows: >> >> \markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.coda" } >> >> Looking at the code behind the web page, it looks like that is >> correct, so this is really just a curious enquiry - why is the # >> required if I want a markup, but it's not required if it's a markup >> within a mark ??? > > Different versions. It's just recently that you could write strings > within a markup without # before them. The Documentation is likely > newer than your version of LilyPond. > Thank you both ...
I'd like to run the latest version :-) but at the moment my main machine is bit-rotting until I get the chance to build my new one... Cheers, Wol _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
