On 2/1/2018 6:43 AM, Peter Toye wrote:
Re: Slow compilation David,
Sorry, I thought this was a well-known issue which had already been
solved. There's some Nabble chat about Windows 10. I thought I had an
email trail for it, but that also seems to have disappeared. Or never
existed.
I'm on 2.19.52 now. That was what I used last time, but I'm sure that
it didn't take 38 seconds to compile a 31-bar piece of polyphony.
The OS is Windows 7 - that hasn't changed either.
Best regards,
Peter
mailto:[email protected]
www.ptoye.com <http://www.ptoye.com>
-------------------------
Thursday, February 1, 2018, 11:21:00 AM, you wrote:
*> Peter Toye <*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>*> writes:
>> Compilation has become very slow, and I suspect it's a return to the
>> font caching problem. I thought I'd asked this question before a year
>> or two ago, but I can't find it in Nabble so I must be dreaming.
>> Can someone please remind me what to do?
> Something must have changed. You don't bother stating what
> system/version you had before the change, and you don't bother stating
> what you had afterwards.
*
Peter,
My batch file should work for you as well, even though I am on Win10 and
you are on Win7.
(Also, disregard the "REM" comment in my batch where it says files older
than 30 days. I must have forgotten to go back and change the comment
after I made the final edits to my batch.)
The code I gave to you deletes all the files in the folder.
But of course you can always manually delete the files as needed by just
navigating to it.
Does deleting these files help your compile times?
*%USERPROFILE%\.lilypond-fonts.cache-2*
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
