Andrea Rossato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to find a cleaner solution: is it possible to define that
> function inside a .ly file?
>
> I tried, by adding a # before the definition, but I get an error message.
Putting the sharp sign should really do it:
#(define-public (note-name->italian-markup pitch)
"Return Italian pitch markup for PITCH."
(make-line-markup
(list
(make-simple-markup
(vector-ref #("Do" "Re" "Mi" "Fa" "Sol" "La" "Si")
(ly:pitch-notename pitch)))
(accidental->markup (ly:pitch-alteration pitch)))))
nicolas
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
