Thanks for replying, Andrew. I'll take a little more time later to go on all the subjects you bring about, however wanted to reply back on one of the points you raise:
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:25 AM, Andrew Bernard <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's impossible to diff PDF's in practice, so I don't think that is a good > idea. And again, if this is a scholarly exercise, then a learned appendix > and footnotes may fare better. > I don't intend to diff PDFs. But if I go into the lilypond source, I'm able to see the differences between one edition an the other. Take this as a simple example: 08:21 $ git diff master..BWV1030-JCAltnikol . | head -n 20 diff --git a/BWV 1030 Flute Sonata B minor/1-andante-flute.ly b/BWV 1030 Flute Sonata B minor/1-andante-flute.ly index 25de80f..df6b1df 100644 --- a/BWV 1030 Flute Sonata B minor/1-andante-flute.ly +++ b/BWV 1030 Flute Sonata B minor/1-andante-flute.ly @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -% Sonata for Flute and Harpsichord BWV 1030 in B minor I Andante +% Sonata for Flute and Haprsichord BWV 1030 in B minor I Andante %{ Copyright 2017 Edmundo Carmona Antoranz. Released under CC 4.0 by-sa @@ -47,23 +47,23 @@ % 11 % Articulation on 3rd beat is on JS Bach's manuscript - dis16 fis c8~ c16 b a'32( g fis16) fis8( g) r d + dis16 fis c8~ c16 b a'32( g fis16) fis8 g r d % 12 4th system from bachs's score starts on 2nd beat cis16 e gis,8~ gis16 a g'32( fis e16) e8( fis) r b, So.... on the flute part for the andante, bar 11 has an articulation on Bach's manuscript that that is missing from Altnikol's manuscript. Ok, ok.... that's a very easy example, but other more complex stuff will also show up on the diffs. BR! _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
