Rutger Hofman <[email protected]> writes: > On 20-04-18 08:46, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote: >> Folks, >> >> in the following example >> >> \version "2.19.80" >> >> One = \relative d'' { >> R1 >> r8 d4 e8 f4 >> } >> >> Two = \relative g' { >> R1 >> r4 e4 d2 >> } >> >> \new Staff \partcombine \One \Two > > As the docs state, the decision about which partcombiner mode to > choose (Apart, Chords, SoloI, SoloII) is hard, and can frequently > mismatch with the user's expectations. In that case, it is OK to > specify the mode yourself.
That's a bit of a euphemism. The main problem is that the part combiner is really stupid with regard to dealing with note ends (basically it doesn't): its operation is very much focused on note starts instead. It also does not have much of a notion of rests. More often than not, it's not really a question of which rendering should be chosen for best results but rather how to give the abysmally stupid part combiner the right hints for doing a job it should have "obviously" done by itself in the first place. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
