From: Evan Driscoll <[email protected]>
Date: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 at 12:42 PM
To: Carl Sorensen <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Hickman <[email protected]>, Kieren MacMillan
<[email protected]>, David Kastrup <[email protected]>, Lilypond-User
Mailing List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Slurs do not work with Larsen articulations
That sounds good to me.
Thanks for the feedback.
In case it's not clear, my pseudo-objection to the wording
+Note that @code{[} and @code{]} do not enclose the notes to be
+slurred.
is that the ( and ) literally *do* enclose the notes that are slurred, except
for the first. I get that the intent seems somehow different between 'a( b c)'
and '(a b c)' in terms of what the parens mean, but the 'b' and 'c' still are
enclosed by the parens even in the LilyPond syntax.
Since they only enclose *all but the first* note of the slur, they don’t
enclose the notes to be slurred.
a b ( c d ) will not put a slur encompassing c and d, but encompassing b, c,
and d. That is the primary mistake that newcomers make.
But the wording that you helped me to see is probably clearer, so I will
certainly go with that.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
