The examples in the documentation portray the placing of finger numbers after notes as respectable. If you look at this file, which has left hand fingering well done, you will see that it is not. I don't think you can find a single instance of a finger number directly after a note. There is only one in an edition I have from a plate engraved in 1853. I don't know how old this one is, but they have the awful "classical" quarter rest instead of the s-z rest, introduced about 1810. The point is that these engravers were conservative to a fault.
There is no effort at all to keep fingering off of staff lines. In mine there is absolutely no fingering on leger lines though. The idea seems to be that the fingering, and even sometimes the dynamics(!), should flow along with the notes. See for yourself. This is from the Royal Danish Library "RIBS" collection. It is the third part of Carcassi's "Complete Method", arguably the most sucessful music publication of all time, in print continuously since 1838. You can see a lot of big names on the cover. See the top line of No. 7 for fingering with sharps. http://www.kb.dk/elib/noder/rischel/RiBS0086.pdf -- The only technical exercises for guitar which are worthy of the instrument consist in "Dynamic Guitar Technique". I promise miracles. Get it at: http://www.openguitar.com/dynamic.html daveA David Raleigh Arnold dra..at..openguitar.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
