Thomas Morley <[email protected]> writes: > 2018-06-04 23:41 GMT+02:00 Aaron Hill <[email protected]>: >> On 2018-06-04 14:16, Thomas Morley wrote: > >> Would it be worth having LilyPond emit a warning when there are hidden >> articulations? Especially since you make it sound like there could be >> potential problems with saying `<c:16 e:16>` as opposed to `<c e>:16` beyond >> that the tremolos do not render. > > I don't think it's a problem having the tremolo in the 'articulations > of notes in a chord. It is simply dead code and not doing anything (at > least at the moment). This is more a matter of code-hygiene. > I'm more concerned about having the tremolo in the chord's > 'articulations then in the 'elements. > I vaguely remember some problem with this, can't put my hands on it > right now, though.
The core code has been changed to actually heed those as well but there may be utilities and/or LSR snippets and user code (and likely the articulate script) and some random other remaining code that does not expect them there. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
