> Actually I think \edmark and \edMarkup (or something along these lines) > might be the best compromise between the generality of the command, > expressiveness and practicality. > > Urs > > My $0.02 is that you should spell out \editorialMark.
\edMark is not expressive enough. We're not in an 8.3 epoch, there is no cost to a few extra letters to say what you really mean. Thanks, Elaine Alt 415 . 341 .4954 "*Confusion is highly underrated*" ela...@flaminghakama.com Producer ~ Composer ~ Instrumentalist -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
