Hi Phil,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 1:18 PM Phil Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm no expert on lily's beaming system. However, in your second example
> you don't break an existing beam with a bar/line break, so it's rather
> different from the first where the "correct" beaming was broken.
>
>
Not knowing anything about how Lily works, I'm inclined to agree. in 3/4
(at least here) a measure comprising only 8th-notes will be beamed straight
through, thus (pseudo code):
e8[ e c' c c c c]
Whereas a 4/4 bar is beamed in two groups of four.
So you're correct, that there's something going on with default beaming
being broken up. In fact, with the following MWE (also in 4/4):
\version "2.19.80"
\relative c'' {
c e, g8 a
\bar "" \break
g e g16 a b8
}
the "g8 a" at the end of the first line is *also* broken into two unbeamed
8th-notes, but the two that follow the break do not. Why would this be?
Cheers,
A
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
